Match a Leakey Injury Site to the Correct Building Project Record

Start with the property and feature supported by the account

Record the address, business or facility name and the exact area involved using the information you already have. A parking area, walkway, doorway and interior room should remain distinguishable rather than being described as the building in general. Identify whether the location comes from a receipt, photograph, encounter paper or personal recollection. A contractor's mailing address is not the physical scene, and the address of a larger organization may identify an office elsewhere. If a property has more than one building or entrance, retain the route through it and mark the point that still needs confirmation.

Keep the construction title separate from the facility name

The public TDLR entry TABS2024000890 uses the project title Community Health Development Clinic-Leakey. The provider's own location page identifies Rolling Hills Health in Leakey. This is an example of why a records inquiry may need both a project title and a public-facing facility name. It does not establish that another property or an individual's encounter belongs to that project. Preserve the exact names and the source for each. If the relationship remains uncertain, ask the organization to clarify it rather than replacing one name throughout the file or assuming a present business name proves historical ownership or control.

Retain an address discrepancy instead of silently fixing it

The example's TABS location field reads 140 W. Rand Road 337, while the provider publishes 140 W. Ranch Road 337. Both identify Leakey, but the spelling difference should remain visible when explaining how a potential match was found. Supply the project identifier and the complete published references when asking for clarification. Do not decide from a similar address alone that a project covers the precise doorway or surface involved in an account. Preserve a supported site photograph or actual document as its own source, and ask about the relation between the project boundary and the feature rather than assuming it.

Read the project scope and status within their limits

The example entry describes new construction and lists site improvements including a parking lot and sidewalks. It also displays start and completion-date fields and a Project Closed status. These are database fields, not an event-time inspection or proof of when each physical feature was installed. A scope label can suggest a focused question about the relevant part of a project without establishing its final construction, maintenance history or condition. Keep the retrieved entry and date together. This guide did not obtain plans, an inspection report or completion documentation and does not interpret the status as a safety or accessibility certification.

Use project identifiers without changing a public record

TDLR's public project-search page separates filters for project number, project name, facility name and status. Its Architectural Barriers FAQ also links project tools separately from technical information and complaint resources. Use a verified identifier to describe an existing entry; a search field is not an invitation to register or alter a project while preparing an injury file. This research read the public example and search landing page without creating an account or submitting data. The presence or absence of a search result cannot establish every permit, applicable requirement or document held by a local office or private organization.

Ask the agency for the specific material still needed

TDLR's published Public Information Act policy links its Open Records Center and lists other written request routes. Identify the relevant project number, feature, period and document category when asking about existing material the agency may hold. An inquiry for a project file is different from asking a technical specialist to interpret a standard or submitting a new complaint. Keep those purposes and any responses separately labeled. No records request was made for this guide, and the existence, completeness or release of particular plans or inspection material was not verified. A provider's public location page is also not a patient-record request procedure.

Present the matched documents as leads for further review

Prepare an index showing the actual scene evidence, any candidate project, the name or address discrepancy and what remains unconfirmed. State why a project seems relevant without describing it as part of the event until the connection is supported. Keep observations and clinical findings attributed to their actual sources. A qualified professional can assess technical, medical or legal questions using the records that relate to the individual situation. AskLegalMatters offers information and lead connections without affiliation with TDLR or the provider. This local example alleges no injury or defect, and a public project listing does not decide causation, compliance or responsibility.

Official sources and verification notes

Related local and state guidance

Existing city injury guides · Texas state resources · More dedicated locality articles