Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 166a: Summary Judgement

Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 166a: Summary Judgement


When it comes to civil litigation in the state of Texas, one of the most important procedural rules to be aware of is Rule 166a, which governs the use of summary judgment in legal proceedings. Summary judgment can be a powerful tool for litigants, as it allows for the resolution of a case without the need for a full trial. Understanding the ins and outs of Rule 166a is crucial for any attorney or party involved in a civil lawsuit in Texas.

Overview of Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 166a

Rule 166a provides the framework for when a party to a civil lawsuit may move for summary judgment. According to the rule, a party is entitled to a summary judgment if there is no genuine issue of material fact and the party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. In other words, if there are no disputed facts that would require a trial to resolve, the court can grant a summary judgment based on the law as it applies to the undisputed facts.

Timing of Summary Judgment Motion

One of the key aspects of Rule 166a is the timing of when a party may move for summary judgment. The rule states that a party may move for summary judgment at any time, no later than 20 days before the date of the hearing on the motion. This provides both sides with an opportunity to present their arguments and evidence to the court before a decision is made. It is important for litigants to be mindful of this deadline and ensure that they file their motion in a timely manner.

Standard for Granting Summary Judgement

Another important aspect of Rule 166a is the standard that the court must apply when deciding whether to grant a summary judgment. The rule specifies that the court must grant the motion if the movant shows that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. This means that the party seeking summary judgment must demonstrate that there are no disputed facts that would require a trial to resolve, and that the law supports a judgment in their favor based on the undisputed facts.

Importance of Summary Judgement in Texas Civil Litigation

Summary judgment can be a critical tool in civil litigation for both plaintiffs and defendants. For plaintiffs, a successful motion for summary judgment can lead to a swift resolution of their case, avoiding the time and expense of a full trial. For defendants, summary judgment can be used to dispose of a case early on, sparing the defendant from the burdens of a prolonged legal battle.

Efficiency of the Legal Process

One of the primary benefits of summary judgment is the efficiency it brings to the legal process. By allowing for the prompt resolution of cases where there are no genuine issues of material fact, summary judgment helps to streamline the litigation process and conserves judicial resources. This is beneficial not only for the parties involved but also for the court system as a whole.

Cost Savings

Summary judgment can also result in significant cost savings for litigants. Trials can be lengthy and expensive, involving substantial legal fees, court costs, and other expenses. By avoiding the need for a trial through a successful motion for summary judgment, parties can save on these costs and potentially recover legal fees as well.

Challenges and Limitations of Summary Judgement

While summary judgment can be a valuable tool in civil litigation, it is not without its challenges and limitations. Understanding these limitations is crucial for litigants who are considering making or opposing a motion for summary judgment.

Disputing Material Facts

One of the primary challenges to obtaining a summary judgment is the presence of genuine issues of material fact. If there are disputed facts that are central to the claims and defenses in the case, the court cannot grant a summary judgment. This means that if the opposing party can raise legitimate disputes as to material facts, the motion for summary judgment is likely to be denied.

Complex Legal Issues

Another limitation of summary judgment is its applicability to complex legal issues. If the case involves nuanced legal theories or areas of law that are in dispute, summary judgment may not be appropriate. In such cases, the court may find that a full trial is necessary to fully address the legal complexities involved.


Rule 166a of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure provides the framework for the use of summary judgment in civil litigation. Understanding the requirements and limitations of summary judgment is crucial for any litigant involved in a civil case in Texas. By leveraging the power of summary judgment effectively, parties can potentially resolve their cases in a timely and cost-effective manner. However, it is important to be mindful of the challenges and limitations of summary judgment, and to carefully evaluate whether it is the appropriate course of action in any given case.

Overall, Rule 166a serves to promote the efficient resolution of civil disputes in Texas, while also maintaining the integrity of the legal process. By adhering to the requirements and standards of summary judgment set forth in the rule, parties can achieve just and expeditious outcomes in their civil litigation matters.

Leave a Comment